Chapter Six is giving me fits. It should have been done already. I should be typing it up, getting it ready to send to my critique partners. But no. It’s sitting in my red binder, looking really really bad. A big mess. It’s only “sort of” done. All the scenes are there, but the last one is sketchy and all the ones before it have a problem—a big one. But I don’t know what it is.
I spent some time yesterday evening brainstorming in my notebook, just writing down some thoughts about this chapter and what might be wrong with it. In the first place, I panicked right in the middle of writing this chapter, because up ’til now my story has crawled along at an almost soap-opera-like pace, and now suddenly things are speeding up, and I felt like it was getting away from me. That was scary. But it also doesn’t seem to be the problem with Chapter Six. Perhaps it is part of the problem, though.
All I can figure out is that I’m working some of these scenes from the wrong point-of-view (POV), and that in my haste to get the chapter written, I’ve had characters (one in particular) acting in a way that goes against his nature—just in a small way, but still.
So last night, I was just plain stuck.
In Chapter After Chapter, Heather Sellers recommends that all book-writers choose “Six Wise Guides” to refer to as they write. These are the books to study and to refer to when problems arise—and only six, so as not to get overwhelmed and confused by too many good ideas/techniques/styles/etc. The first three are to be books on writing. Sellers recommends one for inspiration; one on craft; and one on things like manuscript preparation, submission to publishers and agents, marketing your book, etc. The second three should be three books “exactly like the one you want to write.”
When I told my husband about the three “exactly like the one you want to write,” he rolled his eyes and said what I thought the first time I read about the Wise Guides: “Exactly like it? If they’re exactly like it, then why don’t you just read those? Why bother writing your book at all?”
I tried to explain what I think Sellers really meant: three books from the same genre; three books that are so amazing you set them down after reading and go, “I wish I’d written that!”; three books with similar themes to the one you are trying to write. That sort of thing.
Sounds simple, right?
I had a dickens of a time coming up with my three Wise Guides for fiction. The how-to books were a snap: I chose the Sellers book, of course, as well as On Writing Romance by Leigh Michaels and Revision and Self-Editing for Fiction Writers by James Scott Bell. Maybe I could’ve chosen better, but those seemed like the right choices as I was beginning. But really, I could not think of a single novel that is “exactly like the one I wanted to write.” My main motivation all along was to write the book I’ve always wanted to read but that didn’t exist!
So I considered what came close. Staggerford by Jon Hassler. Wild Rose by Ruth Axtell Morren. And then I threw in Scarlet Feather by Maeve Binchy, because it’s an amazing book—one of my all-time favorites—and is loaded with characters, much like I knew my own novel would be. Its subject matter and themes aren’t perfectly in line with what I’m writing, but I figured “so what?”
Well, the time finally came. I was stuck; I needed help. Pull out the Wise Guides.
I went to the Binchy book first, because of all the characters, lots of POVs. Except it turns out that she mixes them all together, the POVs. She’ll start a scene with one character and switch to another, and another another, as many as she feels like. Lots of head-hopping. Just reading a few scenes, it took me several minutes to adjust to that, and honestly, I wasn’t sure I liked it. Yet I know without a doubt that Scarlet Feather is a superb book.
Moving along. Wild Rose is a Christian romance novel, written in a style like most romance novels these days—with two POVs, the heroine’s and the hero’s, alternating. I love books written this way. It’s clear, easy to follow. It’s also not how I’m writing my novel—at least, not right now. I was too impatient last night to delve into this book more intently. I needed to look at an example of multiple points of view, shown in alternating fashion. I trust Wild Rose will help me later on, though. It’s a beautiful novel.
I haven’t read Staggerford in years, but it’s always stuck with me. In my memory, it was all third-person singular. Bad memory. It’s another head-hopper novel. An awesome, amazing novel with selective head-hopping. No help there.
I seemed to recall that LaVyrle Spencer always did a good job of switching POV with each scene, and that she would show more than just the hero’s and heroine’s points of view. She always had good subplots going on. I dug out Vows, my all-time favorite of her books.
Guess what?
As I’d done with the other novels, I opened it up to chapter six. Right away, I was reading this POV, then that POV, then this one again. . .head-hopping. Yet, it works so well for LaVyrle Spencer. I was immediately roped into the story, my heart started to ache—she does such a fabulous job of portraying the emotions associated with falling in love!—and I couldn’t put it down.
But why had I remembered this all wrong? I’d thought she switched POV only with scene changes. I went back to the beginning of the novel, where she began with just her hero, riding into town. About three paragraphs after he sees the heroine for the first time, the POV shifts to her, then back to him again. She commingles POVs, so we can see the hero’s thoughts on one line and the heroine’s on the next. It’s incredible and beautiful and probably so far above my skill level that it’s not even funny.
*Sigh*
Now what?
I turn to Julie Lessman. All three of her novels so far are loaded with characters, and I knew I wasn’t remembering wrong: she really does switch POV only with scene change. She’s a superb storyteller, too. Here is something I can wrap my brain around. Perhaps I need to make one of her books a Wise Guide.
[Correction: I said in the above paragraph that Julie Lessman switches character POV with each scene. If fact, she often switches POV within scenes, but she does it by leaving white space between the sections, so it's very clear. I think I got confused when I was rapidly perusing all this fiction for some sort of direction. I saw that lovely white space, saw that there was a new POV, and assumed, "Ah yes, new POV, scene change," without looking more closely. I was just looking for something that looked right, something I could hang on to and know would provide good examples, and A Passion Denied was it! That book is going into my Wise Guides pile, for sure.]
But what does it all mean, that these novels I most admire, that have stuck with me for years and years, are written this certain way, with all these head-hopping POV shifts? Am I supposed to write that way, myself? Have I been doing it “wrong” for six chapters?
What a muddle. I went to my fiction Wise Guides for help and came away all confused. Maybe I need to turn to my how-to Wise Guides instead. Or maybe there is no easy solution to the problem I am having. Maybe I just need to be patient. Maybe the subject matter of this chapter is all wrong in the first place and will have to go to the cutting room floor. Maybe I won’t be able to write these scenes until much farther down the road, when my first draft is complete.
Maybe the muddle is meant to show me (again) that I need to let go of my awful perfectionism and just let something be terrible and off-kilter for a while. It’s not the end of the world. I think I’ll just get that chapter typed up and put it out there. I have friends who will probably turn out to have a lot more wisdom than those Wise Guides when it comes to this mess I have made.
Onward.